The Seasons of The Great Gatsby - Post Eleven

In F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald pins the story of Jay Gatsby and Daisy during the summer season, and parallels their love story along with the climax of the summer heat.  The novel also ends with Gatsby's death right as the impending presence of Autumn approaches.  In the beginning of the novel, when we first meet Nick, before Gatsby is seen for the first time, Fitzgerald writes, "And so with the sunshine and the great bursts of leaves growing on the trees, just as things grow in fast movies, I had that familiar conviction that life was beginning over again with the summer." The change or progression into the summer opens up the story and thrusts the plot line forward.  It is in the summer weather that Gatsby throws his lavish parties, Jordan and Daisy are able to sit around all day embodying the definition of conspicuous consumption, and Daisy and Gatsby momentarily rekindle their lost love.  The summer seems to represent the rebirth of "life" for the characters of the novel.  During the summer season, the action of the novel takes place, and becomes a transition period.  Nick moves in next to Gatsby, Gatsby finally find's Daisy again, and the characters constantly travel to New York City through the Valley of Ashes.  The summer is a period of movement where the period of time outside the summer becomes stagnant. 

As the summer ends, as the seasons transition into fall, it is then that Gatsby's story falls apart.  While Gatsby is laying in the pool, under the falling Autumn leaves, Wilson shoots Gatsby and then kills himself.  While life began again with the coming of summer, it ends at the coming of autumn.  Because the novel is continually in a state of transition, the summer serves as a bridge that the movement is guided along.

The Theory of the Leisure Class - Post Ten

After being thoroughly confused while reading Thorstein Veblen's, The Theory of the Leisure Class, I decided that I wanted to try and find some easier, more relevant examples to help all of us better understand the idea of Conspicuous Leiuse as well as Conspicuous Consumption.  First, I simply Googled both of these terms to see what funk images I could find to help us better understand these upper class "societal" terms.

Here's what I found...

Conspicuous Leisure:

I think this one speaks for itself...

Not so sure how this one fit in with "Leisurely Consumption," but Google Images did...we talked about pets in class?

People have been doing nothing for as long as we can remember.

Modern day Leisurely Consumption-she doesn't have to do anything but look good and drink that nice alcoholic beverage....

Conspicuous Consumption:
(these pictures seemed to fit the definitions we talked about in class much better)

Everyone needs a pink Hummer, right?

I think this cartoon represents Conspicuous Consumption so well!  It exemplifies the pressures to show off wealth that the upper class were sure to face as well as their excessive, lavish spending and lifestyle.

I think that Veblen would have to agree with this statement.

I thought that these pictures did a pretty good job helping me better understand these two terms, but then I found this You Tube video and I don't think that even Veblen did such a great job at explaining conspicuous consumption...see for yourself...(also, I really think that this applies to a lot of what we've learned and studied over the semester-except maybe the cocaine part?)

As the last line of this gem of a song so aptly puts it, "it's over for most of the characters we've read about in their towns"

House of Mirth - Post Nine

Lily Bart is a stunning woman who desperately tries to fit into an elaborate social scene throughout the course of House of Mirth.  She also fails to choose a man to marry and ends up alone and dead at the end of the novel.  After reading House of Mirth, along with the other novels we have read this semester, I couldn't help but wonder:  Is it possible to ever be happy within a higher social class?  Wharton's novel tells us that it is not.  Lily cannot find happiness within the upper elitists.  We also see that the other characters of the novel, within the higher social class, struggle through marriage issues, a seeming desperation to show off their wealth, and they fail to recognize anything of true value.  Their are characters within House of Mirth who do exhibit strong humility and exemplary morals, however, they are poor and alone.  In expressing her opinions about Gerty, Lily says that she is "happy," but lives in a shabby apartment and has given up so much. 

Furthermore, in The Rise of Silas Lapham, we see the Lapham family try to fit in with the Coreys and their "old money, elite social class"  but fail to do so by the end of the novel.  Howell sets up the Laphams in direct contrast to the Coreys and eventually, the Laphams are forced to go back to where they came from.  In Maggie, A Girl of the Streets, Maggie briefly enters into  a relationship with Pete.  He shows her into a higher social class that she has never experienced only to abandon her and leave her to prostitution and death. 


In relation to House of Mirth, most of the other novels we have read this semester (not just the two listed above) all characterize rich and poor in the American culture and set down similar standards as to what was socially acceptable at that time.  After reading house of mirth and relating it to our class as a whole, I think that all of our authors are telling us that people of extreme higher class lack the ability to function within any sort of relationship and are far from happy.

Beauty and Style in House of Mirth - Post Eight

In House of Mirth, Edith Wharton obsesses over Lily Bart's beauty and social appearance throughout the course of the novel.  Wharton consistently mentions Lily's clothes, and her desire and need for more.  After reading through Wharton's lavish descriptions of the dinner parties and the extreme amounts of money that Lily spends, I couldn't help but wonder what some of these outfit's looked like.  I started looking at certain photos from the House of Mirth movie and was surprised at how ugly some of Lily's clothes were-here is just a sample:

After looking at some of Lily's hideous outfits from the movie, I then became interested in all the different kinds of fashion during the Gilded Age.  It seems that most of the fashionable outfits at this time focused on bawdiness and extreme frills and lace.  As we saw through Lily, a woman's clothes were representative of her  wealth and social class.  The bigger, the better.  More lace, bigger hats, and fancier dresses only meant more money.  So, as I was browsing through some pictures of these very interesting outfits -example two:

 

 I started to wonder...Has anything really changed since Lily Bart's time in regards to fashion? Sure, most women today would never be caught dead in a corset and large brimmed hat with more feathers than a peacock, however, I think that clothing has always been and still one of the most common and easiest ways of representing wealth.  We define different types of jobs, and the amount of money earned is these professions, to be either a blue or white collar .  Even at Colby, the type of bag you carry around or the certain types of shoes that you have are all displays of certain social standing.  I'm pretty sure we'd never see this guy walking across the quad:

and Colby students most definitely stick out like sore thumbs at the local Waterville Walmart:

Just one of the many preppy outfits seen on Colby's Campus

Yes, this woman actually went to Walmart dressed like this. 

That being said, I am posing this question:  Without wealth, is it impossible to dress "appropriately"  or in a manner than conceals any sort of social class standing? 

Silas Lapham - Blog Post Seven

After our class discussion on the difference between the "Upper Crustys" and the "Non Crustys" in The Rise of Silas Lapham I couldn't help but wonder whether or not an "Upper Crust" can ever embody the positive character traits of a "Non Crusty." I began thinking about different people within our modern day society that are of an "Upper Crusty" status but still have not strayed from moral value. How bout Bill Gates? Many people consider him to be a philanthropist...

This couple started Shawmut Construction in Bosoton and then sold it to their employees. Now they dedicate their lives to philanthropy all over the world and started the Ansara Family Fun and the Haiti Fund out of the Boston Foundation. They donated over 2 million dollars to start the Haiti Fund. What do you think the Corey's would think about the Ansara family?

Finally...OPRAH! Probably one of the most famous philanthropist, and one of the wealthiest women in the world (shes a big Upper Crusty) can we deny her positive impact on the world?

Maybe we need to think of another name for "Upper Crustys" who've made an Impact??

After watching Sam's hilarious videos in class today, I thought that I'd add some youtube humor to my blog as well. Over the course of Silas Lapham, we see the Laphams push their new money against the Corey's old money. The Corey's reject the idea of the Lapham's newly found wealth, and seem to believe that they can never be equals. I find it interesting that the amount of actual money that either families have is not really what mattershttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTTEpRq9bmE. Instead, the origin of the money is what seems to be important.

I then began thinking about our society today and whether or not the idea of new or old money still applied...then I remembered this clip of this trashy MTV show I happened to see a few weeks ago. The show, "You're Cut Off" is about rich, spoiled women who are cut off from their families money. Even though these girls are just short of, if not millionaires, are they classy? What would the Corey's say about them? Does their money represent new or old, and aren't they trashy even tough they represent a higher social class?

See for yourself!

"How the Other Half Lives" by Jacob Riis - Blog Post Five

Jacob Riis' How the Other Half Lives is a non fiction, historically accurate account of the poverty and tenement housing in New York City's Lower East Side. In comparison to our other readings, I found it very helpful to get an in depth view of the conditions that many immigrants faced upon coming to America. Riis' article proved to be a bit more arduous to get through because it did not use any sort of humor or comedic relief to draw its readers in. However, I did find that the tragic reality that so many people during the 19th century horrifying. Riis' article looked at the "Genesis of the Tenement," as well as the different types of diseases that these people were exposed to and the virtually unlivable conditions of the tenement houses. Like Twain and Crane, Riis' constructs poverty throughout the course of his book to pain a picture of loss and deprivation. Furthermore, although all three authors approach the subject of "rich and poor" within America in very different ways, after reading Riis' article, they all seem to center on the same issues regarding money. Extreme poverty, as seen in Crane and Riis, and even extreme wealth, as seen in Twain can cause a lack of family or domestic life, a decline in health (mental and physical), a downfall in an employment and economic system, as well as an obsession with social climbing and survival.